Re: [PATCH V3 2/7] PM / OPP: Introduce "domain-performance-state" binding to OPP nodes
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-28 15:14:15
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Ulf Hansson <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-28 15:14:15
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
[...]
quoted
---> Parent domain-2 (Contains Perfomance states) | | C.) DeviceX ---> Parent-domain-1 | | | ---> Parent domain-3 (Contains Perfomance states)I'm a bit confused. How does a domain have 2 parent domains?
This comes from the early design of the generic PM domain, thus I assume we have some HW with such complex PM topology. However, I don't know if it is actually being used. Moreover, the corresponding DT bindings for "power-domains" parents, can easily be extended to cover more than one parent. See more in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt [...] Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html