Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module
From: Tony Lindgren <hidden>
Date: 2017-01-12 00:47:58
Also in:
linux-can, linux-omap
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2017-01-16 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module · Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
- 2017-01-16 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module · Yegor Yefremov <hidden>
- 2017-01-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module · Tony Lindgren <hidden>
- 2017-01-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module · Tony Lindgren <hidden>
- 2017-01-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Adding DT support for TI HECC module · Yegor Yefremov <hidden>
* Yegor Yefremov [off-list ref] [170111 13:52]:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:05 PM, [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> This is an attempt to revive DT support for TI HECC that was started in 2015. I haven't changed much because not all questions could be fully answered: * Should HECC use "am3505" as compatible?I mean "ti,am3505-hecc"
Yeah it should use the device name for the driver.
quoted
* What should be done to the offsets (ti,scc-ram-offset, ti,hecc-ram-offset, ti,mbx-offset)?
The devicetree maintainers need to ack the binding doc. Maybe send that as a first patch? Regards, Tony
First submission and related comments: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/8616
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html