Re: [PATCH linux v1 0/4] Seven segment display support
From: Neil Armstrong <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-14 13:14:04
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml, openbmc
On 12/14/2016 01:56 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:45:30PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:quoted
Hello, On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 23:55:00 -0800, Jaghathiswari Rankappagounder Natarajan wrote:quoted
Documentation for the binding which provides an interface for adding clock, data and clear signal GPIO lines to control seven segment display. The platform device driver provides an API for displaying on two 7-segment displays, and implements the required bit-banging. The hardware assumed is 74HC164 wired to two 7-segment displays. The character device driver implements the user-space API for letting a user write to two 7-segment displays including any conversion methods necessary to map the user input to two 7-segment displays. Adding clock, data and clear signal GPIO lines in the devicetree to control seven segment display on zaius platform. The platform driver matches on the device tree node; the platform driver also initializes the character device. Tested that the seven segment display works properly by writing to the character device file on a EVB AST2500 board which also has 74HC164 wired to two 7-segment displays.FWIW, I proposed a driver for seven segment displays back in 2013: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/139986.html And the feedback from Greg KH was: we don't need a driver for that, do it from userspace. See: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-January/139992.html So: good luck :-)Did anyone ever write a library for this type of thing? Again, I don't want to see one-off drivers for random devices like this that should be able to all be controlled from userspace in a common manner. Much like we did for fingerprint readers a long long time ago... thanks, greg k-h
Hi Greg, Actually, it's more than a random interface, a lot of SoCs and boards actually have such displays and it's a pity to use UIO, sysfs gpio bitbanging and all sort of ugly stuff to only print a few characters a simple and clean driver could achieve. Some very well known SoCs even have integrated registers to lower the BOM and bypass the need for a 74HC164 like component and avoid gpio bit banging. My personal concern is that you could also need to drive more segments, thus 7-segments is too restrictive. But this driver is well structured, the gpio-bitbanging sub-driver is welcome. Neil