Hello, Rameshwar.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:36:28PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:

Hi Tejun,

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Tejun Heo [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hello,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:15:00PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:

quoted

quoted

@@ -821,8 +823,6 @@ static int xgene_ahci_probe(struct platform_device

*pdev)
                                dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Error reading
device info. Assume version1\n",
                                        __func__);
                                version = XGENE_AHCI_V1;
-                       } else if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_CID) {
-                               version = XGENE_AHCI_V2;

Can you please explain this part a bit?  Everything else looks good to
me.

Here we should not assume XGENE_AHCI_V2 always in case of having valid
_CID in ACPI table.
I need to remove this assumption because V1_1 has also valid _CID for
backward compatibly with v1.

Can you please repost with the above explanation added to the commit
message?

Thanks!

-- 
tejun