Re: [PATCH 1/2] of, numa: Add function to disable of_node_to_nid().
From: Robert Richter <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-26 13:43:08
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 25.10.16 14:31:00, David Daney wrote:
From: David Daney <david.daney-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On arm64 NUMA kernels we can pass "numa=off" on the command line to
disable NUMA. A side effect of this is that kmalloc_node() calls to
non-zero nodes will crash the system with an OOPS:
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00081bba84>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xa4/0xe68
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00082163a8>] new_slab+0xd0/0x57c
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc000821879c>] ___slab_alloc+0x2e4/0x514
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc000823882c>] __slab_alloc+0x48/0x58
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00082195a0>] __kmalloc_node+0xd0/0x2e0
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00081119b8>] __irq_domain_add+0x7c/0x164
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b75d30>] its_probe+0x784/0x81c
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b75e10>] its_init+0x48/0x1b0
.
.
.
This is caused by code like this in kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
domain = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*domain) + (sizeof(unsigned int) * size),
GFP_KERNEL, of_node_to_nid(of_node));
When NUMA is disabled, the concept of a node is really undefined, so
of_node_to_nid() should unconditionally return NUMA_NO_NODE.
Add __of_force_no_numa() to allow of_node_to_nid() to be forced to
return NUMA_NO_NODE.
The follow on patch will call this new function from the arm64 numa
code.Didn't that work before? numa=off just maps all mem to node 0. If mem allocation is requested for another node it should just fall back to a node with mem (node 0 then). I suspect there is something wrong with the page initialization, see: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg535191.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387793 What is the complete oops? So I think k*alloc_node() must be able to handle requests to non-existing nodes. Otherwise your fix is incomplete, assume a failed of_numa_init() causing a dummy init but still some devices reporting a node. -Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html