[PATCH 1/2] of, numa: Add function to disable of_node_to_nid().
From: David Daney <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-25 21:31:18
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Subsystem:
open firmware and flattened device tree, the rest · Maintainers:
Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Linus Torvalds
From: David Daney <david.daney-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On arm64 NUMA kernels we can pass "numa=off" on the command line to
disable NUMA. A side effect of this is that kmalloc_node() calls to
non-zero nodes will crash the system with an OOPS:
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00081bba84>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xa4/0xe68
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00082163a8>] new_slab+0xd0/0x57c
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc000821879c>] ___slab_alloc+0x2e4/0x514
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc000823882c>] __slab_alloc+0x48/0x58
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00082195a0>] __kmalloc_node+0xd0/0x2e0
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc00081119b8>] __irq_domain_add+0x7c/0x164
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b75d30>] its_probe+0x784/0x81c
[ 0.000000] [<fffffc0008b75e10>] its_init+0x48/0x1b0
.
.
.
This is caused by code like this in kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
domain = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*domain) + (sizeof(unsigned int) * size),
GFP_KERNEL, of_node_to_nid(of_node));
When NUMA is disabled, the concept of a node is really undefined, so
of_node_to_nid() should unconditionally return NUMA_NO_NODE.
Add __of_force_no_numa() to allow of_node_to_nid() to be forced to
return NUMA_NO_NODE.
The follow on patch will call this new function from the arm64 numa
code.
Reported-by: Gilbert Netzer <redacted>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/of/of_numa.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/of.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
index f63d4b0d..2212299 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c@@ -150,12 +150,27 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_distance_map(void) return ret; } +static bool of_force_no_numa; + +void __of_force_no_numa(void) +{ + of_force_no_numa = true; +} + int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) { struct device_node *np; u32 nid; int r = -ENODATA; + /* + * If NUMA forced off, nodes are meaningless. Return + * NUMA_NO_NODE so that any node specific memory allocations + * can succeed from the default pool. + */ + if (of_force_no_numa) + return NUMA_NO_NODE; + np = of_node_get(device); while (np) {
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 299aeb1..6f6244e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h@@ -850,11 +850,13 @@ static inline void of_property_clear_flag(struct property *p, unsigned long flag #if defined(CONFIG_OF) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA) extern int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *np); +extern void __of_force_no_numa(void); #else static inline int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; } +static inline void __of_force_no_numa(void) { /* Empty */ } #endif #ifdef CONFIG_OF_NUMA
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html