Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: Multiple regulators aren't supported yet

[PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2016-09-21
[PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: Multiple regulators aren't supported yet · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2016-09-21
Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: Multiple regulators aren't supported yet · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2016-09-23
Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / OPP: Multiple regulators aren't supported yet · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2016-09-26
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property · Stephen Boyd <hidden> · 2016-09-22
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2016-09-23
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2016-09-23
Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2016-09-26

From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-23 19:59:19
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:02:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

Multiple regulators per device aren't supported yet by the kernel code
and the bindings provided in documentation aren't sufficient to handle
that case (as there is no way for kernel code to link multiple
voltage/current values to a power supply).

What do you mean? Because the supplies are in the cpu node?

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help