On 09/05/2016 02:09 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:

On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:

quoted

On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:

quoted

Rob,

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

+
+TI-SCI Client Device Node:
+========================
+
+Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
property.

As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
(i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.

Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.

Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
-> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.

Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?

No objections, I think this is a logical move.

Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new
version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?

Just closing the loop here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/6/747 posted. 
the changes are in binding - clk driver itself should'nt by itself 
have any changes.


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html