On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:

Rob,

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:

[...]

quoted

quoted

+
+TI-SCI Client Device Node:
+========================
+
+Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci" property.

As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
(i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.

Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.

Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
-> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.

Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?

No objections, I think this is a logical move.

Regards,
Dave

---
Regards,
Nishanth Menon