Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] arm: parse cpu capacity-dmips-mhz from DT
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: 2016-08-31 08:14:51
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, lkml
On 30 August 2016 at 18:28, Juri Lelli [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Vincent, On 16/08/16 10:20, Vincent Guittot wrote:quoted
Hi Juri, On 19 July 2016 at 14:40, Juri Lelli [off-list ref] wrote:[...]quoted
quoted
+static int +init_cpu_capacity_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long val, + void *data) +{ + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data; + int cpu; + + if (cap_parsing_failed || cap_parsing_done) + return 0; + + switch (val) { + case CPUFREQ_NOTIFY: + pr_debug("cpu_capacity: init cpu capacity for CPUs [%*pbl] (to_visit=%*pbl)\n", + cpumask_pr_args(policy->related_cpus), + cpumask_pr_args(cpus_to_visit)); + cpumask_andnot(cpus_to_visit, + cpus_to_visit, + policy->related_cpus); + for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) { + raw_capacity[cpu] = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu) * + policy->max / 1000UL;Should it be policy->cpuinfo.max_freq instead of policy->max ?Right. I'll fix the arm64 bits as well.quoted
quoted
+ capacity_scale = max(raw_capacity[cpu], capacity_scale); + } + if (cpumask_empty(cpus_to_visit)) { + normalize_cpu_capacity(); + kfree(raw_capacity); + pr_debug("cpu_capacity: parsing done\n"); + cap_parsing_done = true;ok so you do that once with the 1st governor that will be registered for the CPU. Can't you unregister the notifier then ?I tried, but the only place I could find to unregister it is from the callback itself; and it is not possible to do so AFAIK. Suggestions?
yes, you're right Can't you queue a work to unregister your callback ? That's may be overkill but it seems weird to keep this notifier that will do nothing, registered for the whole life of the system
Thanks for the review. Best, - Juri