On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:33:20PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:

On 2016-07-19 06:14, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

+batman@0a {
+    compatible = "lltc,ltc1760";
+    reg = <0x0a>;
+    #address-cells = <1>;
+    #size-cells = <0>;
+
+    i2c@1 {
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <0>;

Rob, aren't those two lines inherited from above?

I too think they are inherited, but am a bit undecided whether I want
that fact to be explored or not, as they just happen to match. They do
not express the same thing (it is for the i2c-mux number in the parent,
and for the i2c device address in the children).

Ah, I see. If they don't mean the same thing, then we should be rather
safe than sorry, I guess.

But the repetitions are indeed tedious when there are many muxed
buses...

Yes.