Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add J-Core AIC driver
From: Rich Felker <hidden>
Date: 2016-07-27 13:06:15
Also in:
linux-sh, lkml
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 05:35:09AM +0000, Rich Felker wrote:quoted
+int __init aic_irq_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent) +{ + struct aic_data *aic = &aic_data; + unsigned min_irq = 64; + + pr_info("Initializing J-Core AIC\n"); + + if (!of_device_is_compatible(node, "jcore,aic2")) { + unsigned cpu; + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + void __iomem *base = of_iomap(node, cpu); + if (!base) + continue;This sounds like it would be a critical error. It would be best to at least pr_warn() if you can't map a CPU's AI interface.
It's looping over possible cpus (per the kernel configuration for max cpus) so it's expected that a system with fewer cpus will also have fewer reg ranges for the aic. This is not an error. If you think there's a different/better way I should write this code, I'm open to suggestions.
quoted
+ pr_info("Local AIC1 enable for cpu %u at %p\n", + cpu, base + AIC1_INTPRI); + __raw_writel(0xffffffff, base + AIC1_INTPRI); + }Here base goes out of scope. If you don't need it, it would be best practice to iounmap it (even if that happens to be a no-op on your arch).
OK. I can add that.
quoted
+ min_irq = 16; + } + + aic->chip.name = node->name;It's probably best to give the name explicitly in the driver (e.g. "AIC"), rather than taknig whatever happens to be in the DT (which should be 'interrupt-controller@<addr>'.
OK.
quoted
+ aic->chip.irq_mask = noop; + aic->chip.irq_unmask = noop;If the core code wants to mask IRQs, how do you handle that? Can you mask your CPU traps?
There's a global imask in the cpu that masks all interrupts that's used in the trap entry point, spinlocks, etc. already. This is a cpu standard feature and not logically part of the AIC. My understanding is that the kernel already keeps a logical mask of disabled irqs in addition to mask/disable at the irqchip level so there's a fairly fast path for ignoring/holding (potentially spurious) irqs while they're supposed to be disabled and deferring them until they're enabled again. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html