Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Shawn Lin [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2016/6/8 6:44, Douglas Anderson wrote:
quoted
There's no reason to store the return value of rockchip_emmc_phy_power()
in a variable nor to check it. Just return it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index 0fce7359d468..188e4c387ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off(struct phy
*phy)
static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
{
I saw the cleanup for power_off is done on [patch 9/11]
shouldn't be in this patch? :)
Yeah, I tried to, but then I realized that I couldn't split that out
too easily because the previous patch touched the same code.
...but actually, reordering things solves all the problems so I've done that.
-Doug