Hi,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Shawn Lin [off-list ref] wrote:

On 2016/6/8 6:44, Douglas Anderson wrote:

quoted

There's no reason to store the return value of rockchip_emmc_phy_power()
in a variable nor to check it.  Just return it.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c

b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index 0fce7359d468..188e4c387ba8 100644

--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c

@@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off(struct phy

*phy)
 static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
 {

I saw the cleanup for power_off is done on [patch 9/11]

shouldn't be in this patch? :)

Yeah, I tried to, but then I realized that I couldn't split that out
too easily because the previous patch touched the same code.

...but actually, reordering things solves all the problems so I've done that.


-Doug