On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:22:33AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:19:15PM -0400, Akshay Bhat wrote:

quoted

Hi Shawn,

On 02/28/2016 08:56 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:

quoted

Rob,

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

I have no objections against the idea and the code itself.
But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the
devicetree maintainers on the above discussion.

Kind regards,
Wim.

Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary?

Any comments?

Is this something you can help with, since you are the iMX
architecture/devicetree maintainer? Appreciate any feedback.

FWIW,

Acked-by: Shawn Guo <redacted>

Guenter,

I think it's reasonable to pick up the patch, if we have it copied to DT
maintainers and on the list for a long period of time, and do not see
any objection from anyone.

The question was if the property name should be ext-reset-output or
fsl,ext-reset-output. In my opinion, it should be fsl,ext-reset-output
because it is not a generic property. Tim disagrees.

So we have two options: Change the property name to fsl,ext-reset-output,
which I would accept, or wait for a devicetree maintainer to make a decision.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html