Re: [PATCH v10 10/13] clk: mediatek: make dpi0_sel propagate rate changes
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2016-02-17 09:19:26
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-mediatek
Hi Michael, thank you for the comments. Am Montag, den 15.02.2016, 15:14 -0800 schrieb Michael Turquette:
Quoting Philipp Zabel (2016-02-03 11:25:59)quoted
This mux is supposed to select a fitting divider after the PLL is already set to the correct rate. Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: James Liao <redacted> --- drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c | 2 +- drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c index 227e356..682b275 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static const struct mtk_composite top_muxes[] __initconst = { MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_ATB_SEL, "atb_sel", atb_parents, 0x0090, 16, 2, 23), MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_VENC_LT_SEL, "venclt_sel", venc_lt_parents, 0x0090, 24, 4, 31), /* CLK_CFG_6 */ - MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_DPI0_SEL, "dpi0_sel", dpi0_parents, 0x00a0, 0, 3, 7), + MUX_GATE_FLAGS(CLK_TOP_DPI0_SEL, "dpi0_sel", dpi0_parents, 0x00a0, 0, 3, 7, 0),So the only instance of MUX_GATE that should not propagate it's request up to the parent is dpi0_sel? Are you sure?
The other way around. This is the only clock I'm sure of that it shouldn't propagate. For the others I don't know, so I want to leave them as they are.
I hope so because this patch changes all MUX_GATE clks to propagate their requests up to their parents, which is sort of a big change.
The MUX_GATE macro previously unconditionally set the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, so nothing should have changed there. See (way) below.
Also, the name game is a bit confusing. I can see that you're trying to prevent having a huge patch that touches every MUX_GATE initialization. However it isn't obvious from the name "MUX_GATE()" that the macro will enable CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT functionality. Maybe put a comment above it just to make it extra clear?
I can do that.
quoted
MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_IRDA_SEL, "irda_sel", irda_parents, 0x00a0, 8, 2, 15), MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_CCI400_SEL, "cci400_sel", cci400_parents, 0x00a0, 16, 3, 23), MUX_GATE(CLK_TOP_AUD_1_SEL, "aud_1_sel", aud_1_parents, 0x00a0, 24, 2, 31),diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h index 32d2e45..b607996 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct mtk_composite { signed char num_parents; }; -#define MUX_GATE(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, _gate) { \ +#define MUX_GATE_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, _gate, _flags) { \ .id = _id, \ .name = _name, \ .mux_reg = _reg, \@@ -94,9 +94,12 @@ struct mtk_composite { .divider_shift = -1, \ .parent_names = _parents, \ .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), \ - .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, \ + .flags = _flags, \
This.
quoted
} +#define MUX_GATE(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, _gate) \ + MUX_GATE_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width, _gate, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) + #define MUX(_id, _name, _parents, _reg, _shift, _width) { \ .id = _id, \ .name = _name, \ -- 2.7.0.rc3
best regards Philipp _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel