RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze
From: Bharat Kumar Gogada <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-27 14:33:58
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/5] PCI: xilinx: Modifying AXI PCIe Host Bridge driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze On Tuesday 12 January 2016 23:06:11 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:quoted
Modifying Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge Soft IP driver to work on both Zynq and Microblaze Architectures. With these modifications drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c, will work on both Zynq and Microblaze Architectures. Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <redacted>I think this patch should be split into three, as you are doing three unrelated things here.
Agreed, will send as different patches in next series.
quoted
------ a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c@@ -92,7 +92,12 @@ #define ECAM_DEV_NUM_SHIFT 12 /* Number of MSI IRQs */ -#define XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS 128 +#define XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS 128 +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM +#define TOT_NR_IRQS XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS +#else +#define TOT_NR_IRQS (NR_IRQS + XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS) +#endifSomething looks wrong here in the microblaze variant. What does NR_IRQS have to do with it?quoted
@@ -238,15 +243,20 @@ static void xilinx_pcie_destroy_msi(unsigned intirq)quoted
*/ static int xilinx_pcie_assign_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) { + int irq; int pos; pos = find_first_zero_bit(msi_irq_in_use, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS); - if (pos < XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS) + irq = pos; +#ifdef CONFIG_MICROBLAZE + irq = XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS + pos; +#endifif (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MICROBLAZE)) irq = XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS + pos;
Agreed.
quoted
@@ -705,7 +715,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_probe(structplatform_device *pdev) #endif pci_scan_child_bus(bus); pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus); +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci); +#endif pci_bus_add_devices(bus); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);Here it looks like microblaze gets it right. I'm not sure why we still need the pci_fixup_irqs() on ARM, but my feeling is that this should be fixed in common code.
In arm pci_fixup_irqs is called by pci_common_init_dev (arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c), since this API is removed now, I was calling it separately. Bharat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html