Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: ltc3589: make IRQ optional
From: Lothar Waßmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-25 12:51:33
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, lkml
From: Lothar Waßmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-25 12:51:33
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, lkml
Hi, On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:23 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:quoted
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:26:10 +0000 Mark Brown wrote:quoted
quoted
You're not just making the interrupt optional, you are also implementing polling support. That's really unusual and there's no clear reason forquoted
Any suggestions how to handle this case in a more sensible way?The above, for example - make the interrupt optional.
This will make it impossible to notify the system about overtemperature (and undervoltage). I implemented polling to be able to get at least overtemperature warnings. (Undervoltage cannot be handled sensibly without interrupt anyway) Lothar Waßmann