Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] dt: paz00: define nvec as child of i2c bus
From: Andrey Danin <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-21 08:51:28
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Andrey Danin <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-21 08:51:28
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c, linux-tegra, lkml
On 21.07.2015 11:25, Marc Dietrich wrote:
I think in this case it would be better to leave nvec and dt as it is for now, and just add the slave function to tegra-i2c. Otherwise we will again have two different "nvidia,nvec-slave" bindings (one for the intermediate hack and one for the final representation). As an alternative, you could also add slave function and port nvec in the same series.
First patch only adds slave functionality to tegra-i2c driver. I sent v3 to fix only tegra-i2c as Wolfram suggested. Unfortunately I haven't fixed all defects and I will resend patch(es). I can resend only first patch (for tegra-i2c) if it is more obvious for everyone.