Re: [PATCH-v4 3/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add new 88pm800 mfd binding
From: Vaibhav Hiremath <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-26 06:13:56
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Friday 26 June 2015 11:35 AM, Yi Zhang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0800, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:quoted
With addition of DT support to 88pm800 mfd driver, this patch adds new DT binding documentation along with respective properties. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f56b751 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +* Marvell 88PM8xx Power Management IC + +Required parent device properties: +- compatible : "marvell,88pm800", "marvell,88pm805", "marvell,88pm860" +- reg : the I2C slave address for the 88pm8xx chip +- interrupts : IRQ line for the 88pm8xx chip +- interrupt-controller: describes the 88pm8xx as an interrupt controller +- #interrupt-cells : should be 1. + - The cell is the 88pm8xx local IRQ number + +88pm8xx family of devices consists of varied group of sub-devices:what about using "88pm80x family of devices..."? for we also have another series of chip, with the name of 88pm88x..
I renamed it after Rob's suggestion, but at that time we didn't see 88pm88x coming. But I think now, I should stick to 88pm800 only, as it doesn't make match with both 88pm822 and 88pm860. Rob, let me know if you think otherwise. Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html