Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2015-06-26

[PATCH-v4 3/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add new 88pm800 mfd binding

From: Vaibhav Hiremath <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-26 06:13:56
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml


On Friday 26 June 2015 11:35 AM, Yi Zhang wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0800, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
quoted
With addition of DT support to 88pm800 mfd driver, this patch
adds new DT binding documentation along with respective properties.

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <redacted>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f56b751
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+* Marvell 88PM8xx Power Management IC
+
+Required parent device properties:
+- compatible : "marvell,88pm800", "marvell,88pm805", "marvell,88pm860"
+- reg : the I2C slave address for the 88pm8xx chip
+- interrupts : IRQ line for the 88pm8xx chip
+- interrupt-controller: describes the 88pm8xx as an interrupt controller
+- #interrupt-cells : should be 1.
+		- The cell is the 88pm8xx local IRQ number
+
+88pm8xx family of devices consists of varied group of sub-devices:
   what about using "88pm80x family of devices..."?
   for we also have another series of chip, with the name of 88pm88x..
I renamed it after Rob's suggestion, but at that time we didn't see
88pm88x coming.
But I think now, I should stick to 88pm800 only, as it doesn't make
match with both 88pm822 and 88pm860.

Rob, let me know if you think otherwise.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help