On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:

Hi Ajay,

On 17 December 2014 at 09:31, Javier Martinez Canillas <
javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> wrote:

quoted

On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

quoted

quoted

You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints

DT

quoted

quoted

bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest

version?

quoted

quoted

I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge
window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to

3.20.

quoted

I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm

happy

quoted

with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the

patches. I

quoted

don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14

but I

quoted

won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal.

It's an

quoted

internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway.

Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess
that the series are finally ready to be merged?

Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since
he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and
re-resend.

Do you have any plans to rebase this so it's ready for merging?

Thierry, Daniel, Dave - whose tree would this be best to merge through?

The plan is for me to take the bridge patches through the drm/panel
tree. I'm going to look at these patches again later this week but from
a very quick peek there don't seem to be any major issues left.

Thierry