Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: at91/dt: add AIC irq1 muxed peripheral id definitions
From: Nicolas Ferre <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-14 13:40:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Le 14/01/2015 14:34, Boris Brezillon a écrit :
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:47 +0100 Nicolas Ferre [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Le 13/01/2015 19:46, Boris Brezillon a écrit :quoted
These ids will be used to define irqs multiplexed on the first irq line. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> --- .../dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.hdiff --git a/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e14a94f --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/atmel-aic.h@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_H +#define _DT_BINDINGS_INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER_ARM_GIC_HNit.: why ARM_GIC?Because I copied it from the arm-gic.h header and forgot to rename those macros :-). I'll fix that.quoted
quoted
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> + +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMC 0 +#define AIC_IRQ1_ST 1 +#define AIC_IRQ1_PIT 1 +#define AIC_IRQ1_DBGU 2 +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTC 3 +#define AIC_IRQ1_RTT 4 +#define AIC_IRQ1_WATCHDOG 5 +#define AIC_IRQ1_MC 6 +#define AIC_IRQ1_SDRAMC 6 +#define AIC_IRQ1_DDRSDRC 6 +#define AIC_IRQ1_RSTC 7 +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMERRLOC 8 +#define AIC_IRQ1_PMECC 9Following up the discussion we had privately regarding these macros (whether we really need them or not), maybe adding a comment above the irqs property would be enough: dumb_irq1_demux: dumb-irq-demux@1 { compatible = "irqchip-dumb-demux"; interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <1>; interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>; /* * Interrupt lines: * 0: PMC * 1: PIT * 2: DBGU * 3: RTT * 4: WATCHDOG * 5: RSTC */ irqs = <0x3f>; };
Well, I tend to prefer when no additional macros are defined in DT for no real added value. So, this comment seems to be enough... I would vote for this solution ;-) Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html