On 10/29/2014 04:56 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Qais Yousef [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 10/29/2014 12:12 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:

quoted

+- mti,available-cpu-vectors : Specifies the list of CPU interrupt vectors
+  to which the GIC may route interrupts.  May contain up to 6 entries,
one
+  for each of the CPU's hardware interrupt vectors.  Valid values are 2 -
7.
+  This property is ignored if the CPU is started in EIC mode.
+

Wouldn't it be better to have this in the reversed sense ie:
mti,nonavailable-cpu-vectors? I think the assumption that by default they're
all available unless something else is connected to them which is unlikely
in most cases. It can be made optional property then.

I don't have a strong opinion about it though.

Actually, I think I like the reversed sense as well.  Perhaps
"mti,reserved-cpu-vectors"?

Yep that's a better wording for sure :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html