Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2014-07-17 00:28:25
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2014-07-17 00:28:25
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
On 17 July 2014 02:48, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think.
Hmm, the other thread around looking at the bindings is really slow. One common thing around the platforms which want to use cpufreq-cpu0 is they have different clocks for ALL CPUs. I was wondering if instead of a clock-matching routine, we can provide some temporary relief to them via some other means. I meant we can allow cpufreq-cpu0/generic to either set policy->cpus to ALL CPUs or just 1. So that existing and these new platforms can atleast get going.. But don't know how should we do that. Not a binding ofcourse, a Kconfig option could work but multiplatform stuff would break. What else? Maybe platform data as we are handling cpufreq-cpu0 with a platform device? -- viresh