Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2014-07-25

Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-16 21:00:42
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml

On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 09:31:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Cc'ing Thomas,

On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect
solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here
is to not delay other patches just because of that.

There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody
else was trying to push for that.

That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead
 of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :)
Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways
I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon.
Hi Mike/Rafael,

Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()":
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html

Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0
file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once
bindings are closed?
I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think.

Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help