Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] spi: s3c64xx: use "cs-gpios" from spi node instead of "cs-gpio"
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-11 18:18:20
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Hello Tomasz, On 06/11/2014 07:50 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On 11.06.2014 19:27, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:quoted
On 06/11/2014 01:38 PM, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:quoted
On 11 June 2014 16:43, Javier Martinez Canillas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 06/11/2014 08:31 AM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:[snip]quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } + cs->line = spi->cs_gpio;I wonder why are you keeping cs->line? AFAICT it's only used in s3c64xx_spi_setup() to request the GPIO and since you get the struct spi_device pointer as a parameter then you can just use spi->s_gpio instead.I'm trying not to touch the non-DT part of the code. struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs = spi->controller_data; This will update the cs->line and cs->fb_delay in case of non-DT.I see, then I prefer the opposite and do something like this on s3c64xx_spi_probe(): if (!pdev->dev.of_node) spi->cs_gpio = cs->line;Hmm, as far as I understand, spi here is spi_device, not spi_master. I don't think you have access to SPI devices on your bus in controller probe().
Right, I was actually looking at s3c64xx_spi_setup() when I wrote that but for some reason I got confused and thought it was the probe() function. Sorry for the confusion.
What I think could work is reworking the driver to: - in DT case, don't do anything in the driver about the GPIO chip select, because it will be handled automatically by the core. - in non-DT case, in s3c64xx_spi_setup(), just take the GPIO pin from s3c64xx_spi_csinfo struct passed through spi->controller_data, request it and save it to spi->cs_gpio, - in non-DT case, in s3c64xx_spi_cleanup(), free the GPIO requested in s3c64xx_spi_setup() and set spi->cs_gpio to -ENOENT (as done initially in spi_alloc_device()). Best regards, Tomasz
Best regards, Javier