Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 4 authors, 2014-07-09

Re: [PATCH 2/6] mailbox/omap: add support for parsing dt devices

From: Suman Anna <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-30 16:01:04
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap, lkml

Hi Pavel,

On 06/28/2014 12:07 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
quoted
The non-DT support has to be maintained for now to not break
OMAP3 legacy boot, and the legacy-style code will be cleaned
up once OMAP3 is also converted to DT-boot only.
quoted
@@ -587,24 +606,157 @@ static int omap_mbox_unregister(struct omap_mbox_device *mdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data omap2_data = {
+	.num_users	= 4,
+	.num_fifos	= 6,
+	.intr_type	= MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE1,
+};
+
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data omap3_data = {
+	.num_users	= 2,
+	.num_fifos	= 2,
+	.intr_type	= MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE1,
+};
+
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data am335x_data = {
+	.num_users	= 4,
+	.num_fifos	= 8,
+	.intr_type	= MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE2,
+};
So you use compatible strings to look up 3 integers. Would it be better to have
num_users/num_fifos/intr_type directly in the device tree? That should be cleaner
and more flexible...

If you do that, would it be possible to have share compatible string?
Yeah, I have actually encoded the .num_users and .num_fifos in DT in the
previous version [1] with shared compatible strings, but dropped those
properties in favour of adding minimal custom properties to DT based on
some offline IRC comments. I have no objections either way, but there is
really nothing to be gained from minimizing compatible strings.

Tony,
Any comments on this?

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2839662/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help