Hi!
The non-DT support has to be maintained for now to not break
OMAP3 legacy boot, and the legacy-style code will be cleaned
up once OMAP3 is also converted to DT-boot only.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -587,24 +606,157 @@ static int omap_mbox_unregister(struct omap_mbox_device *mdev)
return 0;
}
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data omap2_data = {
+ .num_users = 4,
+ .num_fifos = 6,
+ .intr_type = MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE1,
+};
+
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data omap3_data = {
+ .num_users = 2,
+ .num_fifos = 2,
+ .intr_type = MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE1,
+};
+
+static const struct omap_mbox_device_data am335x_data = {
+ .num_users = 4,
+ .num_fifos = 8,
+ .intr_type = MBOX_INTR_CFG_TYPE2,
+};
So you use compatible strings to look up 3 integers. Would it be better to have
num_users/num_fifos/intr_type directly in the device tree? That should be cleaner
and more flexible...
If you do that, would it be possible to have share compatible string?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html