Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 2 authors, 2014-05-27

Re: [PATCHv5 09/10] DTS: ARM: OMAP3-N900: Add SSI support

From: Sebastian Reichel <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-21 20:09:38
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

Hi,

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:43:19AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
quoted
Just noticed that this patch seems to somehow break idle
modes on n900, so dropping both dts changes for now.

Basically the n900 debug LEDs won't ever go off with
these two dts patches enabled, even without the modem
drivers loaded. I did not dig deeper, but it's probably
something related to hwmod using this data for some
settings.
Is hwmod data interpreted at all without the DT entries?
Yes for autoidling unused devices. We parse that with
omap_device_build_from_dt().
That function seems to parse DT stuff. What I meant was
not without the *driver*, but without the *DT entry*.

I think the hwmod entries are completly ignored until there
is a DT device?
quoted
The hwmod data may be wrong. The information from commit
398917ce161e10d3c66afaefdb89c73c64c4b02d was simply
interpolated from all information I found. The OMAP3
public TRM does not contain *any* information about the
ssi IP-Core.
It's probably something with the sysc or idlemodes that
keeps things from idling. Maybe wrong address? Or wrong
flags? I'm pretty sure it was the first .dts patch out of
these two as the second one alone did not apply.
 
quoted
quoted
Sorry did not notice it earlier as I did not have the
PM regression fix patches merged with my testing branch.
I hoped to see working modem in 3.16, which will probably
be used for the next Debian stable :(
That would indeed be nice, let's try to debug it as we
still have few days.
I will have a look at it now.
I'm finally able to test for PM regressions with DT patches,
too > bad we did not have that earlier because of multiple issues.
Yes. More time would have been nice.
Anyways, this dts issue should not prevent merging the
driver changes, I'm all for that!
Of course, driver changes are unrelated. They are already
in linux-next btw.

-- Sebastian

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help