On Friday 15 of November 2013 09:19:02 Eduardo Valentin wrote:

Hello Tomasz,

On 14-11-2013 09:40, Tomasz Figa wrote:

quoted

On Thursday 14 of November 2013 07:31:04 Eduardo Valentin wrote:

quoted

On 13-11-2013 12:57, Tomasz Figa wrote:

quoted

Hi Eduardo,

Hello Tomaz

quoted

On Tuesday 12 of November 2013 15:46:04 Eduardo Valentin wrote:

quoted

This patch introduces a device tree bindings for
describing the hardware thermal behavior and limits.
Also a parser to read and interpret the data and feed
it in the thermal framework is presented.

[snip]

quoted

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..59f5bd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,586 @@

[snip]

quoted

+* Cooling device nodes
+
+Cooling devices are nodes providing control on power dissipation. There
+are essentially two ways to provide control on power dissipation. First
+is by means of regulating device performance, which is known as passive
+cooling. A typical passive cooling is a CPU that has dynamic voltage and
+frequency scaling (DVFS), and uses lower frequencies as cooling states.
+Second is by means of activating devices in order to remove
+the dissipated heat, which is known as active cooling, e.g. regulating
+fan speeds. In both cases, cooling devices shall have a way to determine
+the state of cooling in which the device is.
+
+Required properties:
+- cooling-min-state:	An integer indicating the smallest
+  Type: unsigned	cooling state accepted. Typically 0.
+  Size: one cell

Could you explain (just in a reply) what a cooling state is and what are
the min and max values used for?

Cooling state is an unsigned integer which represents heat control that
a cooling device implies.

OK. So you have a cooling device and it can have multiple cooling states,
like a cooling fan that has multiple speed levels. Did I understand this
correctly?

IMHO this should be also explained in the documentation above, possibly
with one or two examples.

There are more than one example in this file. Even explaining why
cooling min and max are used, and the difference of min and max
properties that appear in cooling device and those present in a cooling
specifier. Cooling devices and cooling state are described in the
paragraph above.

I mean, the definition I commented about is completely confusing. You
should rewrite it in a more readable way. For example, "Cooling state is
an unsigned integer which represents level of cooling performance of
a thermal device." would be much more meaningful, if I understood the
whole idea of "cooling state" correctly.

By example I mean simply listing one or two possible practical meanings,
like "(e.g. speed level of a cooling fan, performance throttling level of
CPU)".

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+
+- cooling-max-state:	An integer indicating the largest
+  Type: unsigned	cooling state accepted.
+  Size: one cell
+
+- #cooling-cells:	Used to provide cooling device specific information
+  Type: unsigned	while referring to it. Must be at least 2, in order
+  Size: one cell      	to specify minimum and maximum cooling state used
+			in the reference. The first cell is the minimum
+			cooling state requested and the second cell is
+			the maximum cooling state requested in the reference.
+			See Cooling device maps section below for more details
+			on how consumers refer to cooling devices.
+
+* Trip points
+
+The trip node is a node to describe a point in the temperature domain
+in which the system takes an action. This node describes just the point,
+not the action.
+
+Required properties:
+- temperature:		An integer indicating the trip temperature level,
+  Type: signed		in millicelsius.
+  Size: one cell
+
+- hysteresis:		A low hysteresis value on temperature property (above).
+  Type: unsigned	This is a relative value, in millicelsius.
+  Size: one cell

What about replacing temperature and hysteresis with a single temperature
property that can be either one cell for 0 hysteresis or two cells to
specify lower and upper range of temperatures?

What is the problem with using two properties? I think we loose
representation by gluing two properties into one just because one cell.

Ranges is the representation widely used in other bindings. In addition

Well that sentence is arguable. It is not like all properties in DT are
standardized as ranges, is it?

No, they are not, but property range is a common concept of representing
range of some values.

Anyway, I won't insist on this, as it's just a minor detail. However I'd
like to see comments from more people on this.

quoted

I believe a range is more representative - when reading a DTS you don't
need to think whether the hysteresis is in temperature units, percents or
something else and also is less ambiguous, because you have clearly
defined lower and upper bounds in one place.

It is the other way around. For a person designing a thermal
representation for a specific board it is intuitive to think about
hysteresis in this case. It is a better representation because we are
really talking about a hysteresis here in order to give some room for
the system to react on temporary temperature transitions around that
point. It is possible to use ranges as you are suggesting, but it
becomes confusing.

Probably it depends on what you are used to. I'd like to see opinion
of more people on this.

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+
+- type:			a string containing the trip type. Supported values are:
+	"active":	A trip point to enable active cooling
+	"passive":	A trip point to enable passive cooling

The two above seem to be implying action, as opposed to the general
comment about trip points.

They do not imply action, they specify type of trip.

For me "A trip point to enable active cooling" means that when this trip
point is crossed, active cooling must be enabled. What is it if not
implying action?

But within a board there could be more than one active cooling actions
that could be done, it is not a 1 to 1 relation. Same thing applies to
passive cooling. The binding does not imply a specific action. Just the
trip type.

I'd prefer the "active" and "passive" states to be renamed an their
descriptions rephrased. In general, the idea of having just four trip
point types seems like bound to a single specific hardware platform.

That's a wild guess, but maybe having an unsigned integer to represent
trip point "attention level" would be a better idea?

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

+	"hot":		A trip point to notify emergency
+	"critical":	Hardware not reliable.
+  Type: string
+

[snip]

quoted

+* Examples
+
+Below are several examples on how to use thermal data descriptors
+using device tree bindings:
+
+(a) - CPU thermal zone
+
+The CPU thermal zone example below describes how to setup one thermal zone
+using one single sensor as temperature source and many cooling devices and
+power dissipation control sources.
+
+#include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
+
+cpus {
+	/*
+	 * Here is an example of describing a cooling device for a DVFS
+	 * capable CPU. The CPU node describes its four OPPs.
+	 * The cooling states possible are 0..3, and they are
+	 * used as OPP indexes. The minimum cooling state is 0, which means
+	 * all four OPPs can be available to the system. The maximum
+	 * cooling state is 3, which means only the lowest OPPs (198MHz@0.85V)
+	 * can be available in the system.
+	 */
+	cpu0: cpu@0 {
+		...
+		operating-points = <
+			/* kHz    uV */
+			970000  1200000
+			792000  1100000
+			396000  950000
+			198000  850000
+		>;
+		cooling-min-state = <0>;
+		cooling-max-state = <3>;
+		#cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */

I believe you don't need the min- and max-state properties here then. Your
thermal core can simply query the cpufreq driver (which would be a cooling
device here) about the range of states it supports

This binding is not supposed to be aware of cpufreq, which is Linux
specific implementation.

I didn't say anything about making the binding aware of cpufreq, but
instead about getting rid of redundancy of data, that can be provided
by respective drivers anyway.

There are cases in which cooling devices don't need to use all states
for cooling, because either lower states does not provide cooling
effectiveness or higher states must be avoided at all. So, allowing
drivers to report this thermal info is possible, but questionable
design, as you would be spreading the thermal info. Besides, for the
example I gave, the driver would need to know board specifics, as the
range of states would vary anyway across board.

One thing is the allowed range of cooling states supported by the
cooling device and another is the range of states that are usable on
given board. The former is a property of the cooling device that
in most cases is implied by its compatible string, so to eliminate the
bad data redundancy, you should not make the user respecify that. The
latter you have as a part of your cooling device specifier tuple.

As an example of this, see PWM, GPIO or IRQ bindings. You don't have
{pwm-channel,pwm-duty,interrupt,gpio}-{min,max} properties, because this
is not needed by respective PWM, GPIO or IRQ drivers, as they already
know these parameters.

quoted

quoted

Besides, the cpufreq layer is populated by data already specified in DT.
.

quoted

quoted

+	};
+	...
+};
+
+&i2c1 {
+	...
+	/*
+	 * A simple fan controller which supports 10 speeds of operation
+	 * (represented as 0-9).
+	 */
+	fan0: fan@0x48 {
+		...
+		cooling-min-state = <0>;
+		cooling-max-state = <9>;

This is similar. The fan driver will probaby know about available
fan speed levels and be able to report the range of states to thermal
core.

Then we loose also the flexibility to assign cooling states to trip
points, as described in this binding.

I don't think you got my point correctly.

Let's say you have a CPU, which has 4 operating points. You don't need
to specify that min state is 0 and max state is 4, because it is implied
by the list of operating points.

Please read my explanation above.

quoted

Same goes for a fan controller that has, let's say, an 8-bit PWM duty
cycle register, which in turn allows 256 different speed states. This
implies that min state for it is 0 and max state 255 and you don't need
to specify this in DT.

ditto.

quoted

Now, both a CPU and fan controller will have their thermal drivers, which
can report to the thermal core what ranges of cooling states they support,
which again makes it wrong to specify such data in DT.

Please also read the examples I gave in the thermal binding. There are
case that the designer may want to assign a range of states to
temperature trip points. This binding is flexible enough to cover for
that situation. And without the representation of these limits it would
be hard to read the binding. It is not redundant data, please check the
documentation.

I don't see any problem with just dropping the min and max properties.
All the use cases you listed above will still work, as you have the
cooling state limits included in cooling device specifier.

Best regards,
Tomasz