On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:27:41AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

On 15-11-2013 03:43, Jean Delvare wrote:

quoted

Hi Eduardo,

Hello Jean!

quoted

Sorry for joining the discussion a little late, I could never find the
time to look into this patch series so far.

Well, better late than never, that's what it is said, isn't it? :-)
Thanks for arranging the time to look at these patches.

The patch series have been looked and contributed by several people and
a couple o maintainers now. Starts to be way better than the original
RFC. The core idea still holds though.

quoted

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:46:08 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:

quoted

This patch adds to lm75 temperature sensor the possibility
to expose itself as thermal zone device, registered on the
thermal framework.

The thermal zone is built only if a device tree node
describing a thermal zone for this sensor is present
inside the lm75 DT node. Otherwise, the driver behavior
will be the same.

Cc: Jean Delvare <redacted>
Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

On HWMON side, I got Guenter's solid contributions, as you can see.

Not an argument. I am not perfect, and Jean has a number of valid points.

Guenter