Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2013-11-06

Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio

From: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Date: 2013-11-06 10:15:37
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-gpio, lkml

Hi Linus,

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

This patch fixes the check for the offset in
gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.

Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Is this a regression that should go in right now?
Yes it needs too.
But on top of *what* exactly?

This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
not even on the mainline kernel.
Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
patches have  gone via ARM tree itself [1].
If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.
Is this something that should go on top of the davinci
GPIO patch set that is still being elaborated on?
Nope.

[1]  http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg275267.html

Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help