Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] ARM: dts: add dt nodes for exynos5420 hdmi subsystem
From: Rahul Sharma <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-24 06:35:38
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc
Hi Rahul, Please see my comments inline. On Friday 23 of August 2013 15:54:18 Rahul Sharma wrote:quoted
Add hdmi, mixer, ddc device tree nodes for Exynos 5420 SoC. Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <redacted> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dtsb/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts index bafba25..7dbf1fa 100644--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts@@ -61,4 +61,23 @@ }; }; + hdmi@14530000 { + status = "okay"; + hpd-gpio = <&gpx3 7 0>; + }; + + mixer@14450000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + i2c_2: i2c@12C80000 { + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>; + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <66000>; + status = "okay"; + + hdmiddc@50 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-hdmiddc"; + reg = <0x50>; + }; + }; };You should separate above board-specific changes from this patch and squash it with patch 6/7, adjusting patch subject and description appropriately.quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsib/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 05dee86..7c6214d 100644--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi@@ -274,4 +274,18 @@ pinctrl-0 = <&i2c3_bus>; status = "disabled"; }; + + hdmi@14530000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-hdmi"; + reg = <0x14530000 0x70000>; + interrupts = <0 95 0>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + mixer@14450000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-mixer"; + reg = <0x14450000 0x10000>; + interrupts = <0 94 0>; + status = "disabled";This node looks like a candidate to be enabled here on SoC level, since it does not require any board specific information.
Hi Tomasz, Both hdmi and mixer should be enabled at same time. Mixer don't but hdmi needs hpd gpio information which is board dependent. Thats why I kept them disabled in SoC file. What you say? Regards, Rahul Sharma.
Best regards, Tomasz