Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb: dwc3: msm: Add device tree binding information
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-19 16:21:18
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-omap, lkml
On 08/19/2013 06:27 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi, On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 16:44 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
On 08/14/2013 06:59 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:quoted
From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <redacted> MSM USB3.0 core wrapper consist of USB3.0 IP from Synopsys (SNPS) and HS, SS PHY's control and configuration registers. It could operate in device mode (SS, HS, FS) and host mode (SS, HS, FS, LS).quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txtquoted
+- clock-names :...quoted
+ "sleep_a_clk" : Sleep clock, used when USB3 core goes into low...quoted
+ "ref_clk" : Reference clock - used in host mode....quoted
+ "core_clk" : Master/Core clock, have to be >= 125 MHz for SS...quoted
+ "iface_clk" : System bus AXI clock + "sleep_clk" : Sleep clock, used when USB3 core goes into low...quoted
+ "utmi_clk" : Generated by HS-PHY. Used to clock the low powerI think it makes sense to remove "_clk" from all those names, unless the HW documentation really talks about a clock named e.g. iface_clk yet some other clock names in the documentation don't have the "_clk" suffix, e.g. the "xo I didn't quote.From limited information that I have, I could not say how clock inputs are named from the controller perspective, but I agree that "_clk" suffix looks redundant. Side question: if for example label in controller says "UTMI", should I also use capital letters for the resource or this could be "utmi"?
All the clock-names entries I've seen so far have been lower-case, but I suppose there's no hard-and-fast rule that they couldn't be upper-/mixed-case if that best matched the HW documentation.