Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-29 21:54:28
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ddd6889 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txtMaybe this should go under a new hwspinlock directory?
Will look for Ohad to comment on this.
quoted
quoted
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex Block: + +The hardware block provides mutexes utilized between different processors +on the SoC as part of the communication protocol used by these processors. + +Required properties: +- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex" +- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers +- reg-names: + "mutex-base" - string to identify mutex registers +- qcom,num-locks: the number of locks/mutexes supported + +Example: + + qcom,tcsr-mutex@fd484000 {Maybe it should be hw-mutex@fd484000?
again, will look for Ohad to make some comment on this.
quoted
quoted
+ compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex"; + reg = <0xfd484000 0x1000>; + reg-names = "mutex-base"; + qcom,num-locks = <32>; + };diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c7d80c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + * + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */ + +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/hwspinlock.h> + +#include <asm/io.h><linux/io.h> please.
will change, I choice <asm/io.h> since *_relaxed are arm specific.
quoted
quoted
+ +#include "hwspinlock_internal.h" + +#define SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC 1 +#define BASE_ID 0 + +static int msm_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock) +{ + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv; + + writel_relaxed(SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC, lock_addr); + smp_mb();Are you sure you don't want mb() instead? What is this barrier for? Comment please.
Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.
quoted
quoted
+ return readl_relaxed(lock_addr) == SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC; +} + +static void msm_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock) +{ + int lock_owner; + void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv; + + lock_owner = readl_relaxed(lock_addr); + if (lock_owner != SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC) { + pr_err("%s: spinlock not owned by Apps (actual owner is %d)\n", + __func__, lock_owner); + } + + writel_relaxed(0, lock_addr); + smp_mb();Same here. What is smp_mb() for?
Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.
quoted
quoted
+} + +static const struct hwspinlock_ops msm_hwspinlock_ops = { + .trylock = msm_hwspinlock_trylock, + .unlock = msm_hwspinlock_unlock, +}; + +static struct of_device_id msm_hwspinlock_of_match[];Why not just put the match table here then? Also, can it be const?
Will change and make const
quoted
quoted
+static int msm_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + int ret, i, stride; + u32 num_locks; + struct hwspinlock_device *bank; + struct hwspinlock *hwlock; + struct resource *res; + void __iomem *iobase; + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + const struct of_device_id *match; + + match = of_match_device(msm_hwspinlock_of_match, &pdev->dev); + if (!match) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,num-locks", &num_locks); + if (ret || (num_locks == 0))Drop useless ().
done
quoted
quoted
+ return -ENODEV; + + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mutex-base"); + iobase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(iobase)) + return PTR_ERR(iobase); + + bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, + sizeof(*bank) + num_locks * sizeof(*hwlock), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!bank) + return -ENOMEM; +Style Nit: Maybe we could grow a local variable to get this to be one line. size_t array_size; array_size = num_lock * sizeof(*hwlock); bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bank) + array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
done - k
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation