Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2013-08-13

Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-29 21:54:28
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ddd6889
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
Maybe this should go under a new hwspinlock directory?
Will look for Ohad to comment on this.
quoted
quoted
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex Block:
+
+The hardware block provides mutexes utilized between different processors
+on the SoC as part of the communication protocol used by these processors.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "qcom,tcsr-mutex"
+- reg: Should contain registers location and length of mutex registers
+- reg-names:
+	"mutex-base"  - string to identify mutex registers
+- qcom,num-locks: the number of locks/mutexes supported
+
+Example:
+
+	qcom,tcsr-mutex@fd484000 {
Maybe it should be hw-mutex@fd484000?
again, will look for Ohad to make some comment on this.
quoted
quoted
+		compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex";
+		reg = <0xfd484000 0x1000>;
+		reg-names = "mutex-base";
+		qcom,num-locks = <32>;
+	};
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c7d80c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/msm_hwspinlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
+ * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation, and
+ * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/hwspinlock.h>
+
+#include <asm/io.h>
<linux/io.h> please.
will change, I choice <asm/io.h> since *_relaxed are arm specific.
quoted
quoted
+
+#include "hwspinlock_internal.h"
+
+#define SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC	1
+#define BASE_ID			0
+
+static int msm_hwspinlock_trylock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+	void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+	writel_relaxed(SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC, lock_addr);
+	smp_mb();
Are you sure you don't want mb() instead? What is this barrier
for? Comment please.
Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.
quoted
quoted
+	return readl_relaxed(lock_addr) == SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC;
+}
+
+static void msm_hwspinlock_unlock(struct hwspinlock *lock)
+{
+	int lock_owner;
+	void __iomem *lock_addr = lock->priv;
+
+	lock_owner = readl_relaxed(lock_addr);
+	if (lock_owner != SPINLOCK_ID_APPS_PROC) {
+		pr_err("%s: spinlock not owned by Apps (actual owner is %d)\n",
+				__func__, lock_owner);
+	}
+
+	writel_relaxed(0, lock_addr);
+	smp_mb();
Same here. What is smp_mb() for?
Hopefully, Eric or Jeff can comment.
quoted
quoted
+}
+
+static const struct hwspinlock_ops msm_hwspinlock_ops = {
+	.trylock	= msm_hwspinlock_trylock,
+	.unlock		= msm_hwspinlock_unlock,
+};
+
+static struct of_device_id msm_hwspinlock_of_match[];
Why not just put the match table here then? Also, can it be
const?
Will change and make const
quoted
quoted
+static int msm_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	int ret, i, stride;
+	u32 num_locks;
+	struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
+	struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
+	struct resource *res;
+	void __iomem *iobase;
+	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	const struct of_device_id *match;
+
+	match = of_match_device(msm_hwspinlock_of_match, &pdev->dev);
+	if (!match)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,num-locks", &num_locks);
+	if (ret || (num_locks == 0))
Drop useless ().
done
quoted
quoted
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "mutex-base");
+	iobase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(iobase))
+		return PTR_ERR(iobase);
+
+	bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+		 sizeof(*bank) + num_locks * sizeof(*hwlock), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!bank)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
Style Nit: Maybe we could grow a local variable to get this to be
one line.

	size_t array_size;

	array_size = num_lock * sizeof(*hwlock);
	bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bank) + array_size, GFP_KERNEL);
done

- k
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help