Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make non-linear GPIO ranges accesible from gpiolib
From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-25 14:56:32
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/20/2013 05:57 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
quoted
Your remark seems to reflect one of the following two hardware architectures: +- SPI Physical pins --- GPIO --- pinctrl -+- I2C +- mmc(that's diagram 1)quoted
+- GPIO Physical pins -+ +- SPI +- pinctrl -+- I2C +- mmc(that's diagram 2)quoted
TB10x hardware architecture: +- SPI Physical pins --- pinctrl -+- I2C +- mmc +- GPIO(that's diagram 3) No, I was thinking of diagram 3 above. I'm not sure if diagrams (1) or (2) are common or exist?
The U300 pin controller is obviously of type (1) as it can spy on the signals. The Nomadik pin controller is basically type (2). Maybe this is part of the explanation to why we sometimes tend to talk past each other :-D (I would replace the string "pinctrl" with "pinmux" above, as I just did in my documentation patch adding these diagrams.) Yours, Linus Walleij