Re: [PATCH RFC 06/13] of: Add empty of_find_device_by_node() function definition
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-11 08:59:20
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 20:41:32 +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki [off-list ref] wrote:
This allows users to be compiled without excluding this function call with preprocessor directives when CONFIG_OF_DEVICE is disabled. Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Same question here... Okay, I'll stop replying to these now. :-) When you repost, for each one of these please tell me why the empty version is needed. ie. what is the non-OF code block that is simpler if it doesn't have to worry about CONFIG_OF? g.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- include/linux/of_platform.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/include/linux/of_platform.h b/include/linux/of_platform.h index b47d204..d8f587f 100644 --- a/include/linux/of_platform.h +++ b/include/linux/of_platform.h@@ -96,6 +96,13 @@ extern int of_platform_populate(struct device_node *root, struct device *parent); #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */ +#else /* CONFIG_OF_DEVICE */ +static inline struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node( + struct device_node *np) +{ + return NULL; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_OF_DEVICE */ #if !defined(CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS)-- 1.7.9.5
-- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.