[PATCH RFC 07/13] of: Add empty of_get_next_child() function definition
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Date: 2012-12-10 19:42:29
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
Subsystem:
open firmware and flattened device tree, the rest · Maintainers:
Rob Herring, Saravana Kannan, Linus Torvalds
Add an empty of_get_next_child() function definition so users can be build when CONFIG_OF is disabled and are not required to exclude OF specific parts explicitly with #ifdefs. Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> --- include/linux/of.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 7df42cc..fb92acc 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h@@ -335,6 +335,13 @@ static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void) #define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \ while (0) +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child( + const struct device_node *node, + struct device_node *prev) +{ + return NULL; +} + static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name( const struct device_node *node, const char *name)
--
1.7.9.5