Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 7 authors, 2012-08-24

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-16 19:35:59
Also in: linux-fbdev, linux-tegra, lkml

On 08/16/2012 12:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power
sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must
admit this DT rule kinda sucks.
Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is
there any reason we can't just change the rule?  It'd be rather more
constructive...
I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters
a lot...
In case anyone wants to follow it, it's at:

https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2012-August/018502.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help