Hi,

On Mon, Jul 16 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

Uhm, I seem to have missed that bindings are deemed more "flexible" as
long as they are coupled to in-kernel dts files? Is that discussed
somewhere? I do wonder about it...

Well patches like this are sent out but not commented on from
the perspective of binding stability. So of course, they get merged.

Have a look at this commit:

commit 7f217794ffa72f208a250b79ab0b7ea3de19677f
Author: Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref]
Date:   Sun May 13 00:14:24 2012 -0400

    mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings

This is deleting custom properties from DTS files without
adding any code to fallback-support them on old device trees.

I agree with your point, but just as an FYI: this patch did involve
a conversation about binding stability, and left some attributes
(e.g. ti,non-removable) purposefully alone (and different to the
new generic MMC bindings) to preserve backwards compatibility:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/10409

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [off-list ref]   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child