Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
quoted
Uhm, I seem to have missed that bindings are deemed more "flexible" as
long as they are coupled to in-kernel dts files? Is that discussed
somewhere? I do wonder about it...
Well patches like this are sent out but not commented on from
the perspective of binding stability. So of course, they get merged.
Have a look at this commit:
commit 7f217794ffa72f208a250b79ab0b7ea3de19677f
Author: Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref]
Date: Sun May 13 00:14:24 2012 -0400
mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings
This is deleting custom properties from DTS files without
adding any code to fallback-support them on old device trees.
I agree with your point, but just as an FYI: this patch did involve
a conversation about binding stability, and left some attributes
(e.g. ti,non-removable) purposefully alone (and different to the
new generic MMC bindings) to preserve backwards compatibility:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/10409
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball [off-list ref] <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child