Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-25 00:43:26
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-03-28 · Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds · Grant Likely <hidden>
- 2012-03-25 · Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds · Thomas Abraham <hidden>
- 2012-03-25 · Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds · Grant Likely <hidden>
- 2012-03-24 · Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds · Rob Herring <hidden>
- 2012-03-24 · Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add empty irq_of_parse_and_map() for non-dt builds · Rob Herring <hidden>
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:42:00 +0530, Thomas Abraham [off-list ref] wrote:
On 24 March 2012 21:37, Thomas Abraham [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 24 March 2012 18:42, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 03/24/2012 04:27 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:quoted
Add a empty irq_of_parse_and_map() that returns 0 for non-dt builds and avoid having #ifdef CONFIG_OF around all calls to irq_of_parse_and_map(). Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <redacted> ---Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Go ahead and merge with the rest of your series. RobThanks Rob. It would be good if this patch goes via Grant's devicetree/next. The other patch series that I have posted would go via Samsung maintainer's dt-branch into which this patch can be merged from Grant's devicetree/next.
As replied to on original patch, this isn't necessary. Just merge it via the Samsung tree since you've already got my acked-by on it. g.