Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-10 12:54:39
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-10 12:54:39
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote:
Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name.
I do not see the necessity.
If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names. If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from the node name.
To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose. -- Regards, Shawn