Re: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-06 19:56:06
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-06 19:56:06
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-ide, linux-next, lkml
On 12/06/2011 05:49 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:37:35AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:quoted
1) All OF code and drivers should be migrating to use 0 instead of NO_IRQ for the no-interrupt case. Code which receives irq numbers directly from the OF framework and refers to NO_IRQ, or expects 0 to be a valid needs to be fixed. 2) Where we hit a problem, board code needs to be adapted to remap HW IRQs 0-15 to different software values. (This could be done using irq domains, or not)No AMBA driver I'm aware of ever uses an IRQ number 0 or is passed such an IRQ number.
The watchdog on VersatileAB is on Linux IRQ0. This is easily fixed with VIC irqdomain patches which are queued up. Rob