On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:23:50PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2011 01:47 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:32:19AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
quoted
On Friday 21 October 2011 05:28 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:11:55PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
+ /* find device_node and attach it */
+ rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, regulator_desc->name);
Shawn/Mark,
How about the driver passing the of_node to be associated with the
regulator, as part of regulator_desc, to the regulator core,
instead of this complete DT search and the restriction of having
to match DT node names with names in regulator_desc.
If you agree that we should try to get DT core from creating
'struct dev' for each regulator, the of_node is not being attached
to any 'struct dev' in regulator driver either, so there is no
difference between finding the of_node in regulator driver and in
regulator core.
--
Regards,
Shawn