On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:42:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

*Please* delete irrelevant quotes from mails.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:05:56PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

quoted

Yes, it seems like a good idea given that most drivers seem to blindly
pass the regulator_init_data onto regulator_register, however there
are cases like the twl regulator driver which seems to peek into the
constraints passed from the board to make sure it drops anything that
the hardware does not support,

I'm not sure why twl works in that way.  Is it a sign that those
configuration peeked by twl regulator driver should be encoded in twl
regulator driver itself instead of being passed from the board?  Or
why the board does not pass something matching driver/hardware
capability to save that peek?

It's completely unneeded but harmless, it's there because there were a
large number of discussions going on with the original author and it was
easier to merge the code.