Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings
From: Chris Ball <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-20 18:07:47
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Chris Ball <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-20 18:07:47
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc, linux-tegra, lkml
Hi, On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote at Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:43 AM:quoted
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <redacted> --- I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch, but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should go into the same one. If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.Chris applied them to the mmc-next tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git which appears to be temporarily at: git://dev.laptop.org/users/cjb/mmc
Sending these via Arnd's next/dt sounds good to me. I know we'd usually take changes that require an atomic update through the same tree, but Stephen said in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/352 : I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing Tegra's SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date; it relies on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without patch 3, the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode instead of 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even notice 8-bit support was missing... Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball [off-list ref] <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child