Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-09-20

[PATCH REPOST 1/2] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings

From: Chris Ball <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-20 18:07:47
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mmc, linux-tegra, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote at Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:43 AM:
quoted
On Tuesday 20 September 2011, Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
The bindings were recently updated to have separate properties for each
type of GPIO. Update the Device Tree source to match that.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <redacted>
---
I'd previously sent these to Grant assuming they'd go in his dt/next branch,
but perhaps these should go in through Arnd's arm-soc next/dt branch?
Which tree has the update that changed the bindings? I think it should
go into the same one.

If it's already upstream, I can take it into the fixes branch.
Chris applied them to the mmc-next tree:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git

which appears to be temporarily at:

git://dev.laptop.org/users/cjb/mmc
Sending these via Arnd's next/dt sounds good to me.  I know we'd usually
take changes that require an atomic update through the same tree, but
Stephen said in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/352 :

   I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing
   Tegra's SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date;
   it relies on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without
   patch 3, the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode
   instead of 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even
   notice 8-bit support was missing...

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   [off-list ref]   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help