On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Ah, we're having an impedance mismatch.  I'm thinking specifically
about the device tree compiler and some syntactic sugar for using the
label definition to generate /also/ create alias properties. The
hairiness is related to that and the way that dtc is implemented, not
with the final aliases themselves.

You can generate DTC-style aliases from OFW-style aliases instead (or
as well), it has other advantages (like being more readable, and having
the aliases grouped together).

There is no difference between OFW and DTC aliases as far as I'm aware.

g.