Thread (24 messages) read the whole thread 24 messages, 7 authors, 2009-06-16

Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-15 09:46:18
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 00:12 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted
quoted
+	if (!uioinfo->irq)
+		uioinfo->irq = UIO_IRQ_NONE;
Please don't do this. It's inconsistent if all other UIO drivers require
people to use UIO_IRQ_NONE and you also allow zero. UIO_IRQ_NONE was
introduced because 0 may be a legal interrupt number on some platforms.
Zero is not a valid IRQ number in the kernel (except in arch specific
depths). IRQ numbers are also *unsigned* so -1 isn't a safe definition.

Zero means no IRQ. If any old UIO code is assuming otherwise it wants
fixing.

It is the job of the platform to map a physical IRQ 0 to some other
representation if it exists outside of arch specific code. This was
decided some years ago and a large part of the kernel simply doesn't
support any notion of a real IRQ 0.
Right, and powerpc complies with that rule, so 0 is fine for us.

Cheers,
Ben.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help